Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Those Comment Sections

I miss reading newspapers. I used to like to spread the paper out on the table before me, drinking multiple cups of coffee while reading the paper.

But I never had enough time to read the paper, but didn't want to throw it away until I had a chance to read it. The resulting piles of unread newspapers was a bone of contention between successive roommates and myself.

I don't subscribe anymore. If it goes directly from the little plastic wrapper bag into the recycling bin, what's the point? So I get my news from NPR and from reading online newspapers. I used to get headlines from the New York times delivered to my inbox each morning, and did quite a bit of reading of the NYT online. Something happened and I no longer get that, and I keep saying I'll resubscribe to the headlines just as soon as I read all the emails in my inbox (currently 5200 unread) and delete or file them appropriately.

Most newspapers and media sources have a space for comments after each article. I only sometimes read the comments, and find them occasionally insightful and informative but usually crazy and even downright stupid. Sometimes they make my blood boil enough that I want to comment on the comments, but usually it's too much effort to sign up or sign in (the San Antonio Express News/KENS 5's website is especially cumbersome for some reason) to comment.

One disturbing trend I've noticed amongst those who comment is paranoia, xenophobia, and ignorance bordering on outright lunacy. Lots of racism, sexism, and hatred amongst those who take the time to comment on news items.

A friend pointed me towards this interesting website: http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/06/who-is-the-40-year-old-virgin.html which talks about adults in the 25 to 45 year age range who self-identify as virgins (according to this, homosexual men are 11 times more likely to be virgins than are heterosexual men. It's entirely possible that there are a lot of gay men who have never had sex with men or women---they are gay but celibate.) As usual, the comment section has a few insightful comments, a few stupid ones (like the guy who said people don't know if they're gay or straight unless they've had sex-----so how many men did he have to sleep with before he decided he wasn't interested????? I've known a number of gay men who knew they were attracted to men, or at least to Superman/Batman/Robin/etc at age 6 or 7, and I certainly hope they were not having sex with anyone at that age, much less grown men wearing masks and capes. Sexual orientation is hard-wired for almost all of us, although it's certainly possible for the "mechanics" to work with a person of a gender we're not that attracted to----hence the legions of gay men who married as a cover, and lesbians who denied their attraction to women and married men because surely the roles of wife and mother would make them straight.)

Anyway, then there was this gem of a comment by "G.Anon" in June of this year:

This is due to western females. They can leave school early with no qualifications and reproduce with teen hooligans. Any offspring are maintained through government welfare. The offspring grow into troublesome types like their fathers. The idea that single teen mothers are due to poverty is a lie, designed to turn such females into victims. Of course they would choose to reproduce with more responsible males if they were in genuine poverty. Instead, they deliberately reject such men as being “too nice” and choose to breed with unsuitable types to show that they have the power to decide to live off welfare.

Other females study at school and become feminist professional types. They are "too busy" with their careers, so have children late in life or never at all. They have no concept of sexual attraction toward men, only for having children and money for buying fancy cars, to make ludicrous statements of superiority toward other women. Men who want sex are branded as “typical men”, while the women then complain that a man is no good at sex or they want men with larger penises.

Women make a mockery of civilised values, because their choices mean prisoners and low-IQ types are just as likely to have sexual relationships (and pass on their genes) than law-abiding or intelligent men. Women are to blame for abortion, because they are getting drunk in night clubs and choosing to have unprotected sex with sleazy types because they find it sexually arousing, and they are experimenting with their bodies to see how easily they can conceive, but they don’t have the maturity to become mothers.

Modern media, such as films, trashy women’s and girl’s mags, pop music videos promote the idea that criminality, smoking, drunkenness drug, abuse and violence are cool and sophisticated, encouraging teen girls to copulate with males coz they have groovy hairstyles, drugs, trendy clothes, piercings, tattoos, motorbikes, knives etc. They then watch tv shows like “Big Bang Theory” and get the idea that any civilised man is an unsophisticated loser. Modern society with its welfare payments and panders to the feminist idea that women are the victims of men, and the welfare means women have no motivation to be careful who they copulate with. Women prefer to breed with teen layabouts, fat slobs, and macho posturing types who like to hang out in bars looking mean.

These things make a mockery of family values, education, respect for others, contributing to society and self-improvement. All of this nonsense results in more single people, violence, unwanted kids, people dying alone, etc.


Wow, maybe this guy's a virgin because......he's a blooming misogynistic asshole who completely hates women and doesn't deserve a peek at a pussy, much less to experience one in any other way???? Hey, G. Anon, I haven't "bred" with anyone yet. I'm 42 years old, and know what? Your gender is characterized by fucking clueless morons, G. Anon!!!! That's another post for another day, but I find myself surrounded by clueless, lazy-ass jerks. Of which, judging from your writing, you are probably one. It's pretty clear you're not "too nice" for any woman. Also, G. Anon, for your information, many, even a majority, of pregnant teens are pregnant by men considerably older than they, men in their 20's. Women don't decide to try to make ends meet with a baby on $600 or $800 per month. It's not a great way to make a living. I hear conservative retirees bitch and moan that $3000/month is not enough to live on (even though their house is paid for), then turn around and scream that welfare mothers are living high on the hog----apparently they view $700 or so per month to feed, clothe, and house 2 or 3 people as "high on the hog", whereas $3000 per month is "poverty level" when it comes to themselves.

Next paragraph:Other females study at school and become feminist professional types.

Yeah, I guess we're just downright evil if we want an education and the same rights and privileges that the other half of the population has, huh? First we choose to be lazy welfare queens, then we choose to work but that too makes us evil.


Anon:They are "too busy" with their careers, so have children late in life or never at all.

Earth to Asshole: Lots of women have careers and children. You know, those single women you hate? Many of them marry relatively young, but the child they're married to is much more work than the children they gave birth to, so they get rid of the guy who's taking the grocery money and using it to drink and chase other women.

And where's your opprobrium for men who are too busy being children and making and blowing money, to settle down and commit to a woman and raise a family? Nowhere do you criticize men for not staying home and raising a family. So what gives? It can't be.....that you're a raging misogynistic asshole, can it?

Anon:have no concept of sexual attraction toward men, only for having children and money for buying fancy cars, to make ludicrous statements of superiority toward other women.

Earth to Asshole: Hahahahahahahah!!!!! OMG, are you really that clueless???? Dude, you owe me a new computer, 'cause I snorted tea all over my keyboard and computer!

Okay, let's see:
1) Men are by far the major consumer of "fancy cars". Women tend towards practical cars. Even when you see married couples with children, if there is one vehicle that's a fancy 2 door, 98% of the time, it belongs to the man. The woman is driving the un-sexy minivan.

MEN are the ones who view cars as penis extensions. MEN are the ones that make ludicrous statements of superiority via their vehicles.

Dude, my vehicles: 1981 Honda Civic wagon, bought in 1986 for $2300. 1985 VW Quantum wagon, bought in 1990 for $3500. 1994 Toyota 4wd pickup (my sexiest vehicle ever), bought in 1996. 1984 VW Rabbit Diesel, bought in 2004 for $150. 1991 VW Jetta Diesel, bought circa 2002 for $2300. And my latest, 2003 Hyundai Elantra with dented passenger side, bought in current (damaged) condition in 2008 for $2000 plus trade in of the 1984 Rabbit with a shredded timing belt (and thus blown engine.)

Oh, yeah, I have no concept of sexual attraction for men because I'm spending all my time making love to my sexy cars that I'm blowing lots of money on!!!!

Also, if a woman "has no concept of sexual attraction for men", it means she's a lesbian. If she's heterosexual, she will be attracted to men. If she totally lacks sexual attraction for men, she's either lesbian or (very slight possibility) asexual. But it's not because she's got the hots for cars.

G. Anon (aka "Clueless Asshole"): Men who want sex are branded as “typical men”, while the women then complain that a man is no good at sex or they want men with larger penises.

Well, if a man who was as completely stupid and clueless and filled with as much hate towards women as this writer seems to be, approached me and wanted sex from me, yeah, I'd probably brand him a "typical male" (actually, this guy is plumbing the depths of masculine assholery). And yes, regardless of the size, shape, or other attributes of his equipment, he would be no good at all at sex, because 90% of sex is between the ears. And no, stupid, I'm not saying you hold onto her ears while she sucks your dick. I'm saying that to make love with a woman, you have to make love with HER, her mind, her emotion, her personality, not just her vagina.

And the larger penises bit? (Jeez, has this man ever actually been with a woman? I'm thinking not.) Penis enlargement devices are and always have been and always will be marketed at men. It is not women who are obsessed with the size of the penis, it is MEN who are obsessed at the size. For the most part, most guys are average. They may be on the small side of average or on the large side of average, but most men are average. One of the best lovers I've ever had, also had one of the smallest penises I've ever seen on an adult male----but he had phenomenal hands. Conversely, if a man is too large, he hurts, and sex with him isn't much fun. Like, "oh, dear, we've already done it once this week, I need a few days to mend before we do it again." Who wants that?


Let's look at Clueless Asshole's next paragraph: Women make a mockery of civilised values, because their choices mean prisoners and low-IQ types are just as likely to have sexual relationships (and pass on their genes) than law-abiding or intelligent men. Women are to blame for abortion, because they are getting drunk in night clubs and choosing to have unprotected sex with sleazy types because they find it sexually arousing, and they are experimenting with their bodies to see how easily they can conceive, but they don’t have the maturity to become mothers.


I see. WOMEN make a mockery of civilized values because MEN are prisoners, have low IQ, are shiftless and irresponsible and aren't willing to commit and quit running around drinking and chasing women in order to support and spend time raising children. Of course. It's always the WOMAN'S fault.

Okay, I know many law-abiding men. But not as many law-abiding men as I know law-abiding women. There aren't as many good men out there as there are good women. But obviously, this too is women's fault.

And apparently, all abortion is due to getting drunk in nightclubs and having sex with sleazy men. It's never due to failed contraception, or lack of use of contraception amongst sober people, or lack of money to pay the $90/month for birth control pills. Oh, no, that's never the cause. It's always drunk women having sex with sleazy men they met in bars.

Except......has this guy ever been in a bar? I have. While yes, I realize that women DO go to nightclubs, in the bars I've been in, men outnumber women about 4 to 1. At least 2 or 3 to 1. Which means.....there's a lot more men hanging out in bars, getting drunk, than there are women hanging out in bars, getting drunk. But I'm sure that women are to blame for that fact, too.

Honestly, the bit about "they are experimenting with their bodies to see how easily they can conceive, but they don’t have the maturity to become mothers" chaps my ass. How DARE he, how dare ANYONE, claim that women who get pregnant are "experimenting with their bodies to see how easily they can conceive"????? Does he have ANY idea what an abortion is like? Does he have ANY idea how much thought goes into having an abortion, even for the most ardent pro-choice woman? OBVIOUSLY not. The attitude he displays towards women is so condescending, so hate-filled, as to be beyond the pale. Nowhere does he hold men accountable. From what he himself says, it's quite obvious that the world abounds with sleazy men, but he's saying that the good guys can't get laid because women are self-serving bitches who "have no concept of sexual attraction to men" but they get "drunk in nightclubs" and choose to have "unprotected sex with sleazy types because they find it sexually arousing" and then want to experiment with getting pregnant but then have abortions because they're too immature to be mothers (as opposed to all those mature teenagers who purposefully get pregnant because they want someone to love them, but they don't actually want to be responsible for the baby 24/7 and have to deal with it all the time).

Clueless Asshole has more to say, but why bother refuting him. My point in posting all of this (besides to vent some rage at the Clueless Assholes of the internet) is to show that no, the need for feminism is not dead. I hear people (like, mostly white men, but also a number of "protected" white women) claim that we're all treated equally now and there's no need for feminism and reverse discrimination and equal opportunity, etc. But then, in almost every comments section of every newspaper, and even in the comments sections of some journals read mostly by educated, even intelligent people, you will find comments such as these. Comments and attitudes and beliefs such as those espoused by G. Anon, aka Clueless Asshole, demonstrate all too plainly the need for continued proactive messages and treatment for disadvanted people.

I grew up in South Texas. We girls were given the message, subtly and not so subtly, that the reason for our existence was to please men. It was our fault if we had any sex drive whatsoever, but once we married, we were to bend over backwards pleasing our men. This complete eats at a girl's self-esteem---and then we are criticized for having low self-esteem. No, the need for talking about sexism is far from over. Attitudes such as Clueless Asshole's are far too common.

As for Clueless Asshole, I hope he dies a virgin. It's the most he deserves. Frankly, I think he deserves the loss of both hands, because a man with attitudes like that doesn't even deserve the love and caring that his right hand can provide. But that's probably too much to hope for.




No comments:

Post a Comment